Are you are one of those people that say 'what the fuck use is that to anybody' whenever you see someone has invented an apparently useless gadget or a 'who the fuck in their right mind is going to use that' piece of software or app?
Well then, you're in for a treat because some anally retarded code writing geek has decided that we are all going to need this pointless piece of shite.
G.O.T. also understands that they are considering a similar version for blogger comments too.
G.O.T. also understands that they are considering a similar version for blogger comments too.
Now pin yer bastard lugholes back and listen to this, Mr 'don't-get-out-in-the-daylight-much-socially-dysfunctional-when-I-meet-real-people-too-much-fucking-time-on-my-fucking-hands-sad-twatty-techy-geek' ..... no-one needs a piece of software to decode the tone of MY emails and comments.
When I say 'fuck the mother fucking fucketty fuck off, you cunting pile of shit piss smeg wankstain .... I don't mean 'have a nice day, old bean'.
G.O.T. it!
80 comments:
I use Thunderbird, so you'll just have to work out my mood FOR YOUR FUCKING SELF!!!
LoL!
Hmmm, now let me think ..... everthing in the garden is rosy? ;)
Example - I'd love to know how exactly the sentence "Gordon Brown is a snot-gobbling, evil little cunt" could be misinterpreted. I think I'm being quite polite towards him myself.
"Are you are one of those people that say 'what the fuck use is that to anybody' "
Yes. Like for instance when I started using Twatter. I still think it now. I really can't see the facination.
Eloquently put, as ever Gotty ..
I think we're singing from the same hymn sheet here .. ;)
Bet the fucking thing won't be finely tuned enough to detect irony or wind-ups though ... :-$
GOTTY, get in ahead of them.
Publicise your own version that interprets politicians' statements:-
Input the political statement for a summary of it's true meaning.
The Output is always "Utter Bollox"
Make that "utter, lying bollox" Joe ...
Relatively new to this blogging + commenting malarkey, but I must say I do feel so very much at home gentlemen. I mean in the past when I've told someone he is a useless piece of shit whose mother was probably still trying to get a fucking abortion when he was 14 years old and that he should fuck off immediately, they have usually jumped on the shovel smartly. No misunderstanding there and everyone knew exactly where they were. Perhaps that's why British Gas made me redundant...
Did "Crushed by Insoc" invent this gadget by any chance? You know how we've hurt his feeling recently, with our potty mouthed language.
How does American software know what I want to say? It would change this:
"It annoys the fuck out me that I can't have a fag in a pub any more. If I saw Harriet "Nanny State" Harman I'd stab her up the bum with my cattle-prod and send 30,000 volts up her spine."
to this:
"It annoys the hell out me that I can't have a gay man in a pub any more. If I saw Harriet "Nanny State" Harman I'd stab her up the fanny with my cattle-prod and send 30,000 volts up her spine."
Yes - I'm in some discomfort (to put it mildly!) after straining my left shoulder. I G.O.T. bugger all sleep last night, and just managed to change gear enough times to drive myself to the chiropractor this morning. Now I'm in a rather hazy state, having stuffed myself with pain killers, and trying to chill out with some decent 70's & 80's music.
The only good news is that I'm right handed! - You can make of that whatever you f***ing well want......
"Utter lying self-serving bollox" ?
It's not new. Eudora has had it for years.
If it's anything like the voice recognition software I use, it'll most likely get it wrong anyway!
I used to test software for a living, and with very few exceptions it never works like it should...
Did BG 'make you redundant'; or, did those short-sighted cunts at Ofgas think this country could do without the expertise of that benevolent monopoly that helped preserve the UK's energy self-sufficiency, and so were surplus to requirements?
Wow ... well get well soon me old mate and at least you are still able to type with your right hand. That is what you meant isn't! Or do I need that software O:-)
Yep, you said it, far too polite Grim ;)
I use it to advertise my latest blog posts and that's about it ;)
No .... nor subtle innuendo like "I wouldn't mind parking my car in HER garage whilst spinning me rear wheels mate" ;)
Hey Joe, it's at times like this I could with a code geek .... what great fun that would be to have a site that would actually do that. Hours of fun to be had by all!
And my offering...
"Utter lying self serving arrogant bollox" ;)
You're very welcome Caratacus and it's BG's loss, like Joe said ;)
If anyone suffers from insomnia and doesn't mind being preached to by an over sensitive, holier than thou fuckwit ... then I recommend you follow Dazed's link ;)
LoL Billy, nice translation ;)
Maybe because no-one else wanted it?
I tried that VRS bollocks a few times, to try and save all the typing, but it never seemed to grasp the expletives. The cunt.
Okay okay, you gave me fair warning. Can't argue. And still I clicked on it. Which makes me a twat.
Stick that in your geek software and see if it comes out smelling of "why do I never learn?"
On the positive side ASE, you've done your good deed for the day! You've helped out a bona fide care in the community type person by making him feel wanted. By my rough estimate I reckon, that between us all, we have probably sent him more traffic in the last few hours than he has in a normal year. How kind and considerate we are ;)
Crushed is a sick boy! :-P
And those blog posts of his are seemingly endless - and all about the same fucking thing... him! >:o
And I've probably read a lot more of it than ASE so I suppose that makes me an even bigger twat! *DONT_KNOW*
Do you think it might gather my 'tone' with something like
"Dear customer Services whore, the widget YOU sold me is shit and broken, I want my fucking money back 2DAY or I will break your legs, I know where you live, cunt. C Ya
Banned"
OK, went there, wore out my mouse wheel scrolling down about 7 feet of just one post, imagine my disappointment on finding no comments :-P .
Thanks guys. I was a manager in a company taken over by BG and I made the mistake of criticizing some of their decisions and then being proved right. I wasn't an outstanding manager at all, it's just in the company of those fuckwits I stood out like a star. Failed brewery party managers who couldn't organise an orgy in a brothel with £50 notes wrapped round their dicks. I'm not bitter...
'fuck the mother fucking fucketty fuck off, you cunting pile of shit piss smeg wankstain ...
It is debatable whether the tone of this missive is anti something or other GOT, you have to admit the words, 'the, off,you,pile, and of' all leave room for some fuckwitted bollock brained nambypamby cocksucking fudgepacking cunt, to inffer that there may be a deeper meaning to your message that is just desperately trying to shine through the Tourettes, and not that it was meant personally at all eh?!
No I didn't click through to the Cunt!
Have a nice day now, y'hear!
Don't be daft, Gotty, this wasn't written for us, it was written for ex pupils of government's comprehensive schools who are turning out pupils who desperately need this software ;)
Now if it also put in apostrophes...
Unmistakable I'd say ;)
That's the fucking righteous do-gooding bastards for you. All ways trying to defend people who don't even want defending in the first place ;)
Apostrophes, or lack of them, drive ME fucking mad too Ampers, Good on yer!
I think you must have come across one of the shorter ones Banned ;)
A veritable autobiography of a paranoid fuckwit, I'd say ;)
What about smart arses like me, who can spin both the rear AND front wheels?
Has anybody actually read ALL of it??? I managed the first couple of paragraphs, then just scrolled through. Every so often I thought I'd reached the end, but it was just another paragraph header!
Jesus H Christ.......
Your not the only one whos anoyed by poor english!
Show off! Glad to hear the Panda is still going strong ;)
LoL ..... very subtle!
btw, hope the shoulder is easing a little and we find you in a better mod today. I can't tell from that comment so maybe I DO need the software ;)
".... I made the mistake of criticizing some of their decisions and then being proved right."
No prizes then for guessing which one of those two aspects earned the Golden Boot!
What about the schools in Scunthorpe? They'd never get any e-mails through.
Yes, a lot better than yesterday, thanks. Could be time to delve into "My Music" again, and turn it up LOUD to try and edjurkate the school kids walking past..
Mind you, as they are about to get soaked, I doubt they'll notice!
Oooo, what's that about then or am I being suitably dim? ;)
Glad to hear it and the bit about the schoolkids getting soaked!
That reminds me, I'll have to do another one of those music posts, like the Chillout one I did a few weeks ago..... great fun ;)
Actually Dazed, you are right. I'd love one of these. You see, unlike you philistines, I actually do think before I speak. To make sure what I say doesn't offend. To me, this invention actually sounds like a GREAT idea.
And GOT, you may joke about my little blog now, but before sustained cyberbullying and libel by James Higham, my blog was damn site bigger than your offering is ever likely to be. I doubt your offering will ever get mentioned in one broadsheet newspaper.
In those days, moreover I had rules. All opinions welcome, but I would delete if the tone was offensive to other bloggers. So if you took a swipe at another commenter, I'd delete. I had ethics, you see. We're here to discuss and listen, but listen politely.
So you can sit here and fart at eachother and engage in whatever pointless sweating lager lout behaviour you like feeling all macho and thinking you're cool. I just think you all look very immature. You should have grown out of this sort of behaviour at uni.
You may call me oversensitive and perhaps I am, by your standards. Thing is, I'd like a world where people became more sensitive not less so. A world built on consideration, tolerance and understanding. You know, where people are NICE to eachother.
I wonder- do you people really think you're helping that world come to pass by perpetuating the most disgusting aspects of human behaviour?
You call me self-righteous. Of course. When I was a teenager I seriously considered entering the clergy. I didn't mainly because I enjoy sex too much and subsequently came to the conclusion that in reality, the solution to the problem of realising Catholic aims are in fact- Marxism and Free Love.
Anyway, so as not to be rude let me comment on your post further.
I have often pondered amongst possible inventions we will utilise post-revolution, the concept of a chemical filter for emotions. All emotions are chemical so it is possible to conceive of a device which acted to suppress emotions such as anger and jealousy, only allowing human beings to feel positive emotions.
And before you accuse me of wanting to ENFORCE this, no, I'm not suggesting that. Merely if it was invented, you'd be stupid not to want one fitted. It would make your life easier and everyone else's too.
There's a difference between these things being enforced and you wanting to control them yourself. This device in your post isn't someone else controlling you, it's giving YOU the power to control YOURSELF further. Give you the chance to raise yourself above animal emotions and move further up the evolutionary scale.
YOU actually become FREER.
I wouldn't want to live in a world without emotions but at the same time, I'd like it so that they were all entirely under our control. One day, in my opinion, we'll regulate our emotions entirely by pills of one sort or another and feel 'Love' when we choose and just choose never to feel angry.
And that way there will be one emotion we always feel as a constant. Security :)
"<span>I doubt your offering will ever get mentioned in one broadsheet newspaper."</span>
Maybe that's because I'll never get busted for being a drug dealer, unlike your good self.
Like I give a fuck about stat porn anyway. If you'd been a regular vistor here then you'd know that. Amen.
Jesus - he wants to be a Vulcan! =-O
And he's been libelling James over at my place, too! >:o
Here's an example.....
"<span>I was the victim of a persecution campaign of which James Higham was a key figure. James Higham doesn't believe in Freedom of Speech for Trotskisys who advocate Free Love and the abolition of Marriage"</span>
Funny that!?!...... I think he'd find most people feel the same way! O:-)
Crushed said: "<span>I'd like a world where people became more sensitive not less so. A world built on consideration, tolerance and understanding. You know, where people are NICE to each other."</span>
<span>It's over sensitivity to every little comment that's buggered our society up. You can't legislate against peoples thoughts, although Liebor have tried hard... What you seem to be unable to grasp is that it's not WHAT you say, but HOW you say it. </span>
<span>In years gone by most people had some backbone, and insults were taken in the spirit in which they were made. If you had read some of my earlier remarks in this thread you might have accused me of being a wanker. I wouldn't have objected in the slightest. If you had just walked up to me in the street and said the same thing I wouldn't have been quite so pleased, but I'm not going to run round to the nearest police station and make a "hate" crime complaint...</span>
You don't have to read these pages, or any others if you don't want to. The anger here, and on many other sites is simply a reflection of peoples hatred of having their existence constantly being interfered with by thousands of politicians who think they have a divine right to use us a glorified social experiment.
Most of us are perfectly capable of being nice to one another, but these days we are often more concerned about a "sensitive" person taking it the wrong way....
Grow up!
** Applause ** Hear! Hear!
Barking;
The phrase 'Part vulcan, part Eloi' is a phrase I've often used on my blog for what I hope we'll evolve into.
Now, your langauge says it all. You don't believe in FREEDOM OF SPEECH for those advocating Trotskyism or the abolition of marriage?
So we're not allowed to say it without being harassed or have some right wing bigot run posts accusing you of being into Satanism and comparing you to Jim Jones?
Higham had every right to debarte me in comments sections; he never did that. Just ran posts accusing me of Satanism and folowing me around bullying me in comments sections etc, or getting others to do it for him.
Worse was the fact he used a female stalker of mine- one who'd actually made stalking phone calls to my own grandmother and subjected me to months of e-mail harassment as part of his campaign.
These are facts, Barking.
Whether or not you agree with Trotskism and whether or not you agree with Free Love and the abolition of marriage, you still need to give the proposition a fair hearing and not judge the arguments with a kneejerk response. Debates aren't solved that way.
My policy has always been to present the empirical argument objectively, trying to use deductive reasoning, such as the Occam's razor principle.
It is my view that if one uses completely objective reductionist logic, the Marxist case becomes proven, as does the argument that we need to disestablish marriage and the nuclear family.
You may well disagree. Higham clearly does. But since you haven't analysed the propositions objectively after hearing the arguments using a reductionist approach, how valid can your opinion be?
Most of what Higham alleges on his blog about 'Them' and Illuminati and New world Orders and the like does NOT pass any kind of analytical reasoning. It's full of logical fallacies, vague and dubious coincidental links and as theories go, none of it passes the Occam's razor test. It's little better than the Magnum Opera of David Icke.
Is he free to say those things? Well, yeah. But likewise, I should be entitled to say 'Look mate, this stuff is off the wall. There is no Satan and no Illuminati. Much of what you describe can be explained by Marxist theory without the need to invoke an imaginary grouping of evil.'
I'll admit, I'm a complete reductionist. I believe in science. And I believe with the knowledge we have, now is the time to burn the baggage of the past and reconstruct society to serve the aims of 'The greatest possible happiness and sensde of life worth and fulfillment of the greatest possible proportion of an ever increasing and expanding manner'.
We need to be scientifically objective about this. Our aims are that we expand across the galaxy, our knowledge increases, our lives become easier, the only worry we have is how to make the maximum contribution with our lives to the common good and to ensure overall human contentment and joy continually increase, society becoming ever more harmonious and pleasurable.
This, Barking can only be acheived, my friend, if we do become a bit more Vulcan like :)
You can't work out right and wrong from reading texts written by Iron Age scribes or looking at they did once. That just tells you how their systems worked in times before we understood things like the laws of thermodynamics or evolution theory.
But today, morality is a matter of science. It's all about understanding what chemicals make people feel what, it's about genetic codes, it's about extraction of raw materials, growth of food, it's about efficient systems, it's ultimately all about nuclides, quarks, hydrocarbons, chromosomes.
You think Marxism is about oppression. It's not. Quite the reverse. It's about the road to a world where you become truly free. Where each human being can guarantee that for the most part his world is under his own control. His own life can be operated simply by pressing buttons and will always be exactly as s/he planned it.
Because the system WE have designed will work. And work better than the one 'God' designed.
Intrigued, I made the mistake of having a look. Fuck me don't ee go on and on and on and bleddy on. Lost the will to live after about the third paragraph I think, considered leaving a comment but thought better of it. Never a good thing to mock the afflicted.
Gotty ... GOTTY Oi - he's doing it here now as well. Quick, you get the back-to-front overcoat, ASE get Sims to bring the Roller round the back and I'll keep hitting the fucker until the noise stops.
"<span>Our aims are that we expand across the galaxy, our knowledge increases, our lives become easier" - This might be fine in theory, but history has shown that there will always be some who are unhappy with their lot, and who will stop at nothing (including war) to gain more power and riches. The futuristic SciFi films showing a happy population, with all they could wish for, ALWAYS have a meglomaniac dictator hiding round the corner. </span>
<span>Face facts - your "vision" will always be just that, a vision.
</span>
"<span>But today, morality is a matter of science." - Oh, what like the morals of the scientists involved in one of the greatest scams ever to be foisted on mankind.</span> Laydees 'n Genlemen I give you Mann Made Global Warming....
"<span>You think Marxism is about oppression. It's not. Quite the reverse. It's about the road to a world where you become truly free. Where each human being can guarantee that for the most part his world is under his own control."</span>
<span>Sorry, but when I got to this paragraph I spat my tea & biscuits all over the keyboard...
</span>
"<span>considered leaving a comment but thought better of it"</span>
It probably wouldn't have seen the light of day anyway. Despite people like that banging on about free speech and shit, they do so love their comment moderation and deletion activities.
I think maybe he could do with a few of those 'chemical tablets' he keeps droning on about ;)
Agreed.
I'll get me coat then ----->
I think he's had too many already!
I worked with some people taking Prozac - sorry to be blunt, but I would rather top myself than go down that route....
Wow, Mircrodave!
Those were some well thought and objectively sound refutations! You totally proved me wrong!
Microdave; Democracy wouldn't have been possible in the middle ages. Society EVOLVES. Communism wasn't possibly last century. That's why it didn't work. It is now.
Oddly, Marx himself predicted the downfall of Capitalism would take place in THIS century.
Once the economy had become global and it was no longer possible to find new consumers so that the economy effitively cannibalised itself to keep paying the interest that was once paid by an ever expanding economy that can no longer expand.
As I say, Marxism is a theory of historical progression. But most of his predictions have stood the test of time; history happened as he predicted.
Might I point out, it will hard to have a war if the Earth is a United States of Earth. Granted, there could still be terrorists groups, but the age of war as we know it would be over.
Would you be so kind as to pencil me in for the first of the subversive movements dedicated to the overthrow of the tyrranical United States of Earth, there's a good fellow.
It wouldn't by tyrannical :)
You not read Proudhon, Caratacus? Not aware of the concept of the whiethering away of the state?
In a true Communist Democracy, ALL the people form the legislature. There wouldn't be a central executive either. Complete separation of powers.
In fact, it would be a bit like you had no government, just a lot of separate utility companies with every person being a shareholder. True Communism is, paradoxically, the logical conclusion of the Capitalist dream :)
There is a sense in which in fact, Communism is Anarchy, because there is no longer a distinction between state and society. It's just that it isn't a chaotic anarchy. It's an anarchy that actually ends up being MORE cohesive and efficient- even though it increases individuality- than what we have now :)
You seem to find the suggestions of a New World Order to be pie in the sky (it's not, do some research), yet you think that war will be impossible if we have a United States of Earth. You can't have it both ways.The EU hasn't stopped war between some of the former Soviet states, because people don't like their own identity being trampled on.
The looming breakdown of Capitalism won't (unfortunately) mean we can all go back to managing our own lives in your "harmonious and pleasureable society". It will mean the billionare banking groups and other enormously powerful figures will seize control of all the assets we rely on for our livelyhoods, and we will end up with Communism on a grand scale.
I don't like that thought, but as I've already said the human race is not composed of uniformly nice people. There are some right evil bastards out there, and they invariably get their way....
As for us expanding out into the far off universe - don't you think we've done enough damage to this planet already? When questions are asked as to why we haven't had any visitations from other planets, I chuckle to myself and say "Why the hell would any beings clever enough to have developed interplanetary travel want to come to this sh1thole?" - Except to harvest us for their own nefarious purposes, perhaps.
Or maybe they already are amongst us, and what's happening is all part of some master plan??
The problem with any form of communism is that it doesn't take human nature into account - that's why it will never happen democratically - and there are always some right self-serving bastards in control with an even worse self-serving bastard controlling them!
As far as colonising space is concerned, once we have the technology to be able leave our own solar system and reach other stars where we know there are probably Earth-like planets, we may well encounter something even nastier than us... and if they have superior technology, we're fucked! =-O
Ohhh, I missed all the fun here, I'll have to read later. Trying to get out of the house before it's 105 degrees heat index.
Have a fun weekend, GOT.
Microdave; the term exists. I use it myself. But Illuminati, etc, dear lord.
Yes, Microdave, I've seen the 'research' you lot enjoy. I've also read Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the master blueprint of all conspiracy theorists.
You're thinking on the right lines vis a vis the collapse. We will have Communism, but the bankers won't bring it in. Why would they want it?
Assets you rely on for your livelihoods...
Communism means no concept of property. You won't rely on assets. No one will. You'll rely on a democratic system.
Your last paragraph puzzled me.
What DO you want for our future? Surely evolution and progression is what it's all about?
Don't you ever walk round your home and think 'One day life will be easier'. One day people will be calmer. Happier. More knowledgeable.
You think in terms of a speciers only just coming out of adolescence. That's what we are. We've only recently managed to move beyond slavery, female oppression, racism, torture, capital punishment, monarchy and other nasty things.
Two thousand years ago, people were thrown to lions for fun.
Capitalism creates the mindset creates most of the problems that you refer to. Ultimately because it';s unsustainable and needs vast levels of unnecessary and wasteful consumption as well as the need to waste human labour. These are inbuilt features of the interest based economy.
Proper management solves these issues.
Of course space colonisation is what it's all about! It's at the heart of everything. Probably the single most important deciding factor and the one that proves Capitalism is fxxked. It's failure to propel us into terraforming Mars, a whole world for the taking. If Capitalism worked, they wouldn't be cancelling returning to the Moon.
We can't stay here forever in a divided world. We'll blow ourselves up. Might i refer you, btw, to the fermi paradox. One proposed answer is that all intelligent civilisations are created by violent predators therefore once they split the atom- which they need to do to colonise space- they soon blow eachother up.
I don't accept that grim hypothesis. I actually think we are alone and that's the answer. Alone in this galaxy, anyway. At least as far as Eukaryote life goes.
We are the best there is. the best thing in the Universe, perhaps. And I have faith in our ability to move forward.
Yeah, humanity produices some shit, or has done. But it also produces people like Hawking and Dawkins. It produces Tolkiens, it produces Keats, Byron, Bosch. Amazing guys, really amazing.
Don't you believe that this is worth something and worth believing in?
Every time a would be anarchist is on the back foot he hauls Proudhon out of his arse. Good ole Proudhon (property is theft etc. - except that's MY motorcar and you touch it at your peril old son) that all round good egg who wanted all the jews rounded up and booted out of Fance, Adolf would have been proud especially when he heard Mr P sounding off about the inferior race of negroes.
The reason why your utopia will never work is because some people work hard and some people are lazy bastards. Some will graft away all day for the greater good and some fat untermenschen will open another can of special brew settle back in front of the telly and let them get on with it. We are not all equal - long may that remain the case.
"<span>We are not all equal - long may that remain the case."</span>
A-fucking-men to that! After all, how dreadful would it be if we all ended up being crushed ;)
Will do Bunnikins. Try an ice bath, if you dare ;)
"<span>Or maybe they already are amongst us"</span>
Beckett and Opik look a bit fucking dodgy .... perhaps that would explain it ;)
"<span>Communism means no concept of property. You won't rely on assets. No one will. You'll rely on a democratic system. " - Fine in theory but it hasn't happened in any Communist state so far... Ask the starving people of North Korea if they are happy with nothing. Well, actually, you won't be able to, as the place is pretty well off limits to the rest of us.</span>
"<span>We've only recently managed to move beyond slavery, female oppression, racism, torture, capital punishment, monarchy." - Slavery maybe, but the rest were still alive and kicking the last time I looked.</span>
"<span>Proper management solves these issues." - Again I make the point that power corrupts, and once you put people in postitions of authority it always ends up going to their heads, whether that be under a Capitalist system or Communist.</span>
Dream on....
"<span>Of course space colonisation is what it's all about!" A slight problem is that all our exploration so far has not found anywhere capable of supporting human life, and Mars is definitely not on the list of possibles! Unless you venture down the road of cryo-storage (if we can ever make it work), no humans would live long enough to reach another solar system, even if we were able to locate somewhere suitable. </span>
"<span>We can't stay here forever in a divided world. We'll blow ourselves up." </span>
<span>- Some high profile commenters have implied much the same in the last couple of weeks, and been soundly condemed by the establishment.
</span>
"<span>Yeah, humanity produices some shit, or has done. But it also produces people like Hawking and Dawkins. It produces Tolkiens, it produces Keats, Byron, Bosch. Amazing guys, really amazing." - Again I make the point that the good guys always get shat on by the bad. It may not be fair, but that's the way the cookie crumbles. </span>
<span>All this </span><span>talk of</span><span> "believing" sounds to me suspiciously like the "Happy Clappy" brigade. I've had personal experience of them at a previous place of work, and I'm afraid it's no more than brainwashing. </span>
Sorry, but I'm a realist, and however much I would like the World to magically change for the better, it's not going to happen in my lifetime.
I can't see any further point in trying to continue this discussion - if that makes me a wimp for throwing the towel in, then so be it.
The good guys DO get shat on by the bad sometimes, yes. Think Jesus for one. Trotsky would be another ;) . But by their example they showed responsible leadership. Accepting being shat on by the bad guys and not sinking to their level is how you acheive progress. In the end they do lose. Otherwise we'd still be in the stone age.
Mars, btw IS on the list of possibles. It just needs terraforming, which IS possible, technologically. If we could free the manpower and the resources which we currently waste.
You do realise if we divided the work up proprly and removed the duplication of Capitalist waste we produce enough materials to keep us all in a luxury lifestyle three times over and we can do that on less than ten hours a week each?
So the mammoth project of terraforming our neighbours isn't actually cloud cuckoo land at all.
Oh, you're not a wimp for throwing in the towel. You were a perfect gentleman and that's something I didn't expect to find on this blog.
Post a Comment