tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post5569467890977426986..comments2024-02-17T08:45:56.825+00:00Comments on Grumpy Old Twat: Can You Guess Who It Is Yet?All Seeing Eyehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15671520010496394878noreply@blogger.comBlogger104125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-63085474094484005352010-07-17T13:33:36.000+01:002010-07-17T13:33:36.000+01:00Should read "It wasn't important before.....Should read "It wasn't important before.." Freudian slip? Anyway, fuck it. richardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-71552775813546204602010-07-17T11:20:21.000+01:002010-07-17T11:20:21.000+01:00I never rely on a spell-checker, but yes, fair poi...I never rely on a spell-checker, but yes, fair point. My last reply was childish, drivelling and condescending, so I apologise. Presumably you enjoyed your drink, in which case every cloud, etc etc.<br />Whatever I say meets with stony disbelief and hatred, based on nothing more than the ordinary coincidence of two people with an identical name. Such Pavlovian responses, no evidence necessary, have IMO been engineered on purpose to have us at each others' throats. We then forget about being shafted and manipulated by the State. eg Ban the Burkha - who used to give a fuck if a Bint wore a tent?. I wasn't important before, but now, somehow, it is. Why? <br />That's me done, I've shat my last turd here. Thanks G.O.T for the use of the cubicle and the chance to defend myself. richardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-33812164067394488122010-07-17T01:31:17.000+01:002010-07-17T01:31:17.000+01:00It's also telling that the only people that I&...It's also telling that the only people that I've ever come across that constantly use a spellchecker, and babble on about punctuation etc, in off the cuff comments in blog postings such as this, are far left creatures like yourself and the one below on You Tube, with his telling comment heading for the rest of humanity in general to apperently adhere too.<br /> <br /> Friend of yours? Did you train together at super sleuth academy? Or are all far left twats so easily recognisable?<br /> <br /> http://www.youtube.com/user/chavrecyclerDazed-and-Confusednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-22745607789965300272010-07-17T01:21:28.000+01:002010-07-17T01:21:28.000+01:00"You are"...."You Do".......
..."You are"...."You Do".......<br /><br />Na na na na na!!!!.......<br /><br />And Yep I did have one or two "Straighteners" after reading your tosh..<br /><br />You drivel drove me to drink....<br /><br />Proud of yourself?Dazed-and-Confusednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-13598053168742587022010-07-17T01:12:30.000+01:002010-07-17T01:12:30.000+01:00I can totally empathise with this:
<span>&q...I can totally empathise with this:<br /><br /><span>"Everyone who knows me knows that I am not sexist. I've lived with my wife and daughter for years"</span>rinky stingpiecenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-73698845809304220392010-07-17T00:57:28.000+01:002010-07-17T00:57:28.000+01:00It's "you're fucking losing it."...It's "you're fucking losing it." Keep punctuation to the forefront of your brain, if there's anything there in the first place. English isn't difficult if you make the effort. You missed out "do you" as well, between "And" and "have". Perhaps a good night on the booze, Daft-and-Cuntish? ("than with" should be "by making" and a hyphen is AWOL too...) Probably you've undergone a so-called Comprehensive so-called education. Sad. Oh, and in fact it was you who mentioned reporting me for the crime of plagiarism, a nondescript crime if you say so. Thanks for the written proof that I'm a better man than you, when it comes to penmanship at least . In what other respects do you fall short compared to me? Critical thinking, it would seem. richardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-88787976536441292372010-07-16T23:52:03.000+01:002010-07-16T23:52:03.000+01:00He even looks like a pig. What an ugly bastard.He even looks like a pig. What an ugly bastard.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-40070131364981555432010-07-16T22:37:29.000+01:002010-07-16T22:37:29.000+01:00You keep on calling us "Libertarians" wh...You keep on calling us "Libertarians" why? And have any idea how paranoid you sound, than with a throw away mocking comment about reporting you for some nondescript crime?<br /><br />Whoever you are today.......Your fucking losing it......Dazed-and-Confusednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-67876118142462679722010-07-16T15:02:09.000+01:002010-07-16T15:02:09.000+01:00Report away, in the true spirit of G.O.T.s unmodif...Report away, in the true spirit of G.O.T.s unmodified blog. Aye, Diddums, away and tell the fucking Council. They might give you a badge or certificate for being a good citizen. Let me know how that goes for you, Libertarian!<br /><br />"Hello? Yes, is that the Police? There's this guy Gatward who says he's posted his own e-mail! I'm so offended, yes, he SAYS he isn't a socialist, but he posts as richard... What's that, constable? Why yes, there could be more than one richard, but Barking Spider says it's the same one, and that's all the evidence anyone needs .... What's that? Broken the law? What's that got to do with it?.... No, constable, I realise you have real twats to catch... Err... I think there's someone at the door, thanks for your help, bye!"richardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-77406076826614121652010-07-16T00:56:56.000+01:002010-07-16T00:56:56.000+01:00THat description matches obama to a tee, two =-OTHat description matches obama to a tee, two =-OBunninoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-10610790672257641932010-07-16T00:47:59.000+01:002010-07-16T00:47:59.000+01:00The bastard Kelly insulted ME and called me Stupid...The bastard Kelly insulted ME and called me Stupid.<br />And Twatward called me a village idiot (along with Spidey).<br />Guess I might be doing something right...hee hee.<br /><br />Here's what I say to both of them, and all trolls.Bunninoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-54328002729839982472010-07-15T22:47:23.000+01:002010-07-15T22:47:23.000+01:00Oustanding piece of forensic psychology Gildas and...Oustanding piece of forensic psychology Gildas and, if I might be so bold, a most succinct analogy in conculsion, too.<br /><br />In fact I think that should be used on all future references to the said cuntcillor ... <i>"A </i><span><i>human cockroach. Very tough, very persistent, very horrible, very hard to eradicate, but serving no useful purpose that one can discern."</i></span>GrumpyOldTwatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-30882937289433991862010-07-15T22:42:35.000+01:002010-07-15T22:42:35.000+01:00I spotted that one too, Houdini.
Dumb-fucking-foun...I spotted that one too, Houdini.<br />Dumb-fucking-founded I was to see someone actually try and start a debate about how being stoned to death is better because you live a little longer. WTFF!! Do you know.... I'm almost starting to feel sorry for the sad deranged bastard.<br /><br />NOT.GrumpyOldTwatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-29486927364031463972010-07-15T21:23:09.000+01:002010-07-15T21:23:09.000+01:00Thank you very much Captain
Your obedient servant
...Thank you very much Captain<br />Your obedient servant<br />Gildas the Monk Gildasnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-82748405608300688712010-07-15T19:35:57.000+01:002010-07-15T19:35:57.000+01:00Bloody hell Gildas ..
That's his staff apprai...Bloody hell Gildas ..<br /><br />That's his staff appraisal done for this year ..<br /><br />"Next" !!! .... >:o :-D :-D :-DCaptain Haddocknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-64098663333237895942010-07-15T19:19:16.000+01:002010-07-15T19:19:16.000+01:00Continued thus.
He may well have been physically ...Continued thus.<br /><br />He may well have been physically strong, although probably not athletic (i.e. not popular with his peer group as part of a team). Appreciating these matters the Subject will probably have overcompensated by using brute strength and very assertive, dogmatic, controlling behaviour. Bullying behaviour would be expected. The Subject would take part in activities to make himself the centre of attention – playing the fool, playing “the rebel”. By showing off and by said controlling behaviour the Subject would hope to obtain the attention of a gang or group of sycophantic followers.<br />In adult life the Subject’s resentments coupled with modest intellect would manifest itself in slavish (unquestioning) adherence to any creed or doctrine which would appear to embody challenge to the society which he feels failed him (see above) coupled with further attention seeking and narcissism (seeking election, remaining “rebel firebrand” etc.). The propensity to violence will remain and the Subject will react violently or irrationally to any behaviour which challenges such doctrine because he would be unable to intellectually cope with an attack on these values and beliefs, which act an “intellectual comfort blanket”. The Subject will, however, display persistence and strength of purpose if his attempts at self aggrandisement or achievement of a stated goal.<span> </span>The Subject would be easily manipulated, however, by those of a much higher intellectual capacity and amoral/sociopathic tendency.<span> </span><br />Or less analytically, the Subject is a sort of human cockroach. Very tough, very persistent, very horrible, very hard to eradicate, but serving no useful purpose that one can discern.<br />Gildas the Monk<span> </span>Gildasnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-43097422694772133202010-07-15T19:18:20.000+01:002010-07-15T19:18:20.000+01:00I have done my research now GOT, and here are my c...I have done my research now GOT, and here are my conclusions.<br />The Subject suffers from a form of paranoia which manifests itself by overcompensation in terms of aggressive self righteousness. At a very early age the Subject will have realised that he was not going to be naturally popular. The Subject will (subconsciously or not) have perceived that he was not good looking, nor possessed of sharp intellect or a natural charm or grace so as to be readily accepted by his peer group. He was probably poor. These factors will have produced a very deep seated resentment against any form of authority or society in general which entirely blots out any logic – hence the tendency to take the side of any external agency (Castro, Iran) which he perceives as the “fellow underdog” and challenging the society (country) which has dealt him such a “bad hand”.<br />To be continuedGildasnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-71645619485923337172010-07-15T18:57:04.000+01:002010-07-15T18:57:04.000+01:00"Nonprovincial", you were almost onto ha..."Nonprovincial", you were<i> almost</i> onto half an insult there, until you added the Derek and Clive bit. <br /><br /><br />Fucking awesome :-D <br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/1DkuXBsHytE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/v/1DkuXBsHytE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="170" height="140</a>Corrugated Soundbitenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-56886336591158293322010-07-15T18:15:44.000+01:002010-07-15T18:15:44.000+01:00Had a quick look and then something clicked and da...Had a quick look and then something clicked and dawned on me, and is probably the most serious bit of cuntishness deserving of a fucking good kicking I've seen, een on that fat fuckers site.<br /><br />Look and read, VERY carefully, what he wrote in this thread:<br /><br />http://councillorterrykelly.blogspot.com/2010/07/oh-horror-horror-heart-of-darkness.html<br /><br />Now he is indeed making a case against stoning of an innocent woman in Iran, but at the same time is trying to mitigate and defend Iran as something just as bad, or just as good, as us, Spain, Saudi etc. etc. He is actually defending the fucking Iranians who will stone this woman to death.<br /><br />Look at some of what he has written, and consider that he represents people and is paid out of the public purse.<br /><br /><b><i>What if the prisoner decided that stoning would give him/her another couple of hours to live despite the suffering and, maybe just maybe something might just turn up during that time to save them: let me ask you these 2 questions 1/ just how daft does my suggestion sound? plenty daft I hear you murmur. And 2/ how many times have you been condemned to death? My hypothesis is that arguing for stoning to death is entirely understandable but: it puts some people in the position of supporting capital punishment as long as it’s not by stoning or maybe some other means and; there are many.<br /><br />I agree of course with those who are horror-struck by the very thought of stoning this woman to death (it’s nearly always a woman BTW) but: I find it impossible to look at it in isolation. After all no one has ever been executed and came back to give us their opinion of the method have they (Jesus doesn’t count here) my point is of course that taking a life is wrong: end of story and I find the argument about which method to use every bit as repellent as the act itself.</i></b><br /><br />It really is beyond satire, and I've now rediscovered why I hated this cunt so much.Houdininoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-22208273689674412432010-07-15T18:00:56.000+01:002010-07-15T18:00:56.000+01:00As it happens, I AM sexually frustrated, and right...As it happens, I AM sexually frustrated, and right wing, but not narrow minded, or xenaphobic. In fact, I always made a point of taping "Xena, Warrior Princess" of a Saturday morning. I really liked the lesbian sub text.<br />So that's you told, Mr So Called Intellectual Fancy Dan!<br />Hope this is sufficiently in character for you,<br />Best wishes<br />Gildas the Monk Gildasnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-89390835325836925182010-07-15T17:03:12.000+01:002010-07-15T17:03:12.000+01:00What the flying fuck are you going on about Gatwar...What the flying fuck are you going on about Gatward you twat? So you've stolen some comments that you've located elsewhere on the Internet and re-posted them here?<br /><br />That's fucking plagiarism you U.A.F. twat.<br /><br />I'm reporting you.Dazed-and-Confusednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-11559545758026510382010-07-15T17:01:16.000+01:002010-07-15T17:01:16.000+01:00Nice try TSO but even after reading recent posts l...Nice try TSO but even after reading recent posts like this one (and the ones at CS) he still seems to be carrying on with his feeble fuckwittery. Blind to anything except the great god of delusion ;)GrumpyOldTwatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-74630774629457468732010-07-15T16:57:20.000+01:002010-07-15T16:57:20.000+01:00"<span>Democracy clearly has it's ..."<span>Democracy clearly has it's flaws"</span><br />And gives certain characters plenty of opportunity to (ahem) adjust the votes ;)GrumpyOldTwatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-67476378956052319832010-07-15T16:55:07.000+01:002010-07-15T16:55:07.000+01:00*fap, fap, fap, fap*<i>*fap, fap, fap, fap*</i>GrumpyOldTwatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4229057500348631201.post-47453999807323692462010-07-15T16:51:23.000+01:002010-07-15T16:51:23.000+01:00No offence meant by me at the time Rosie.
Perhaps ...No offence meant by me at the time Rosie.<br />Perhaps I phrased my comment to you, incorrectly.GrumpyOldTwatnoreply@blogger.com